Your child's data/information is being handed over to the government for future military recruitment because if the school doesn't comply they will loose their funding. Are you a willing participant after fully knowing this ? You are warned....you can never say you didn't know this.

Solution? Give up your selfishness.....take your children out of school.....home-school them. Dr. James Dobson and Dr. Laura Schlessinger have put out a call to parents across the nation to take their children out of the public school system now.....not yesterday....now!

Friday, Nov. 8, 2002

No Child's Privacy Left Uninvaded

Buried deep in the 670 pages of the new No Child Left Behind Act is a sensible provision that military recruiters must be given access to school campuses - something that liberal anti-military school administrators at 19,228 schools had denied them.

School officials in San Francisco and Portland, Ore., for example, have barred recruiters from schools because they complain that the military allegedly discriminates against gays and lesbians.

But accompanying that provision was another not at all sensible requirement that recruiters be given not only access to school facilities, but also students' personal information. Failure to comply would result in a cutoff of all federal aid.

Sharon Shea-Keneally, principal of Mount Anthony Union High School in Bennington, Vermont, told Mother Jones magazine she was shocked when she received a letter in May from military recruiters demanding a list of all her students, including names, addresses, and phone numbers.

Her school she said, already invites recruiters to participate in career days and job fairs, but like most school districts, it keeps student information strictly confidential. "We don't give out a list of names of our kids to anybody," Shea-Keneally told Mother Jones, "not to colleges, churches, employers - nobody." Congress approved the new provision after the armed forces complained that this year as many as 15 percent of the nation's high schools are "problem schools" for recruiters.

According to Mother Jones, the Pentagon says that in 1999, recruiters were denied access to 19,228 schools. Rep. David Vitter, a Republican from Louisiana who sponsored the new recruitment requirement, told Mother Jones that such schools "demonstrated an anti-military attitude that I thought was offensive."

But school officials find the personal information requirement equally offensive.

"We feel it is a clear departure from the letter and the spirit of the current student privacy laws," Bruce Hunter, chief lobbyist for the American Association of School Administrators told Mother Jones. "It's a slippery slope. I don't want student directories sent to Verizon either, just because they claim that all kids need a cell phone to be safe."

While the new law allows students to withhold their records, because school officials are allowed to implement the law as they see fit, they sometimes simply hand over student information without even telling the students, thus depriving them of any say in the matter.

"I think the privacy implications of this law are profound," Jill Wynns, president of the San Francisco Board of Education told Mother Jones. "For the federal government to ignore or discount the concerns of the privacy rights of millions of high school students is not a good thing, and it's something we should be concerned about."

Recruiters make no bones about their plans to use school lists to try to recruit students through mailings, phone calls, and personal visits - even if parents object. "The only thing that will get us to stop contacting the family is if they call their congressman," Major Johannes Paraan, head U.S. Army recruiter for Vermont and northeastern New York told Mother Jones' David Goodman. "Or maybe if the kid died, we'll take them off our list."

Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics:

*************************************************

(This is pgs 139 to 166 of the transcript In the original, the lines are double spaced with irregular page placement. Emphasis added is mine. I'm also sending as a Word Doc attachment for those that want it. PLEASE PASS ON!! S. Tenpenny, DO)

........Dr. Tom Mack is our next speaker.

DR. MACK: I wasn't aware of the mandate that I had and I made the arrogant assumption that you might actually be interested in my opinion about the three questions that are open to you, and so I'm going to give it. I will try and deal with the request, as well.

As you probably know, I'm at the University of Southern California School of Medicine. I've been out of the smallpox game for roughly 40 years. My credentials include probably spending more time working up population-based outbreaks of smallpox than virtually anybody ever has. We spent three years in Sheikhupura district in Pakistan and worked up 121 outbreaks, which we estimated were roughly 85 to 90 percent of all the smallpox that occurred in that population of a million or so people. And the experience contrasts somewhat with a lot of the other series because population-based outbreaks include small outbreaks that never result in any hospitalization, and individual importations which never result in any cases coming to the attention of authorities.

So in the Pakistan study, this is roughly a situation where more than a quarter of the people were unvaccinated. It tends to be villages of from two to 20 to 100 crowded compounds, 1,000 to 5,000 people. Any given village received an importation maybe once every ten or 15 years, so these were people who were not familiar with everyday smallpox. And in essence, there was really no medical or public health care, and there are a variety of political and historical reason for that, which we can go into, but the import of it is that there really was no intervention.

You heard several references to my review of the European experience. I'd like to reiterate that this was -- these experiences were in essentially susceptible populations with physicians who were unfamiliar with the disease, media and communication skills much less than today, and the standard of living actually substantially less than today in both Europe and America. So in my opinion, the propensity for spread in both these circumstances is substantially greater than it would be in the United States today.

You're going to hear more about vaccinia. I'm not going to spend any time on that. I just want to point out the last word in this slide, which is VIG. I haven't heard that phrase mentioned today. To me, it should be an extremely important consideration in all of your deliberations because in the absence of VIG, any extensive vaccination would be extremely dangerous.

I'll try and skip data slides because you've seen many of them already. This just reiterates the effectiveness of past vaccination, and in this case it demonstrates that the severity of disease was affected.

This is the study that was previously referred to by the Russian gentleman who tried to vaccinate people who'd previously had smallpox, demonstrating that the history of severity was an important determinant of whether or not he could get vaccination takes, irrespective of the interval since the case occurred.

Okay, the trade-off is with smallpox, and I'd just like to point out that not only is it a nasty syndrome, but the case fatality is probably less than is usually advertised. And the reason for that is that most series are heavily loaded with children. If you look at the age-specific case-fatality rate, it's much lower among adults. And so I would estimate that if we had an importation today in the adult population, the case fatality would probably be around ten to 15 percent.

It does have a truly terrifying pathognomonic appearance, and that's one of the characteristics that would make control much easier. Again, as has been mentioned, there's acute illness during a brief period of infectiousness. There are no reservoirs or vectors. There is a finite half-life in the environment. And most importantly, there's a big -- one to two -- one to three-week interval between generations in which activity for surveillance and containment takes place. And by and large, transmission within social limits is what occurs, not within the population at large. And these, by and large, cannot be sustained. In fact, were there no smallpox eradication program, my guess is that smallpox would have died out anyway, it just would have taken a lot longer.

Now a few slides to show you what it actually looks like. That's hemorrhagic smallpox. This lady was actually not vaccinated, she just has sparse disease. But you can see that the characteristics of the lesions are just the same.

This is a girl at three days of rash. I don't think anybody could pick up that that is smallpox without an awful lot of experience. This is the same girl at seven days.

This is also a man at three days. Unfortunately, I didn't have a slide of him, but he died with very rapid confluent smallpox, and you can detect that it's going to be confluent from his appearance here.

I'll go over these slides because they've been shown before. In 27 percent of the cases in Sheikhupura, there was no transmission at all. Another 37 percent, only one generation. Now we're talking about a place where there really was no care given. The mean length of the outbreaks was six weeks. That's roughly three-plus generations, so a few of the outbreaks were longer. We could detect the source.

Virtually all the people we could identify as introducers, even though sometimes we came upon the outbreaks substantially late. In other words, most people knew where they got smallpox. It wasn't a matter of their having gotten it on a train or gotten it in an unknown place.

The top figure here shows the distribution of cases in the same compound as an introducer, showing essentially the incubation period variation, and it does correspond to what's been known before, one to three weeks. The lower one shows the distribution of cases in other compounds.

I would point out that when one is looking at attack rates, they're always confounded by the nature of the social arrangement. A compound in west Pakistan is very different from a compound in west Africa. The people are much more closely in contact, and so the attack rates here were much higher than they were in west Africa, and I daresay also in Madras because the living arrangements are very different. And the definition of what constitutes a unit for study is very different.

This has been referred to in the past. Twenty-seven percent, again, no transmission. Thirty-five percent, only one or two indigenous generations. Even with the hospitals, no more than six generations. The largest generation was 20 cases.

This is an illustration of the effect of temperature and humidity on the occurrence of disease. This represents the seasonal distribution in Sheikhupura, almost the same figure we derived from seasonal distribution in east Bengal. During the dry season, the cases are much more effectively transmitted than during the wet season. And in fact, it's not just a function of population movement, but it's actually a function of virus survival. If you just look at the last two figure on this graph, there are three times as much effectiveness of transmission to other compounds in the period when the increase in incidence was occurring than when it was decreasing.

Okay. What do we expect if there were a terrorist introduction? I would expect a small number of cases. I don't think suicide dissemination is a very likely possibility because of the severity of the disease. I think that airborne spread would be relatively inefficient and I don't think very many cases would occur, and that's just giving you my personal opinion.

The danger would be from release within a close space, like an airplane. Then there might be several -- a substantial number of cases, but they would all share a common experience and probably could be identified. Cases would be florid because we're an immunosusceptible population, by and large. People would be aware of exposure after the initial diagnosis, and I think dissemination from the individual cases would probably be relatively limited.

The key to any introduction would be, as has been mentioned, surveillance. I think initial recognition would be the most important single factor. Identification and follow-up of contacts, obviously. Isolation of known and probable cases, preventing admission to hospitals and opening separate facilities, and then vaccination of likely contacts.

Initial recognition, to me, awareness of the possibility of the disease, is vastly more important than the details of how to distinguish it from chickenpox. I don't like to see posters with lots of fine print. I like to see a poster with a really big picture, and that would make people aware that the possibility exists. And when they saw that, they'd run to the books and they'd learn what they could otherwise see on posters. Large subtleties will seep through afterwards, just as they did with the anthrax situation.

And by large photographs, this is the kind of photograph that I would like to see on a big poster. These are the classic lesions. That could not be any other disease.

Now very early, it's difficult. But after a few days, there's not going to be much likelihood of error. There will be the occasional case modified by vaccination. But if there's only one case, what worries? There'll be subsequent cases and they'll be much more likely to be diagnosed. So we may miss some if it were to occur, but we won't miss very many.

That's the flat variety that was referred to earlier. Contact identification. Personnel. We don't need vaccination, we need personnel. If smallpox were to come to Los Angeles tomorrow, the more cases we'd expect, the more people we need prepared, and that -- those people may come from San Francisco, they might come from Atlanta, they might come from Michigan, under ideal circumstances.

I would like to think of the fire-fighting as a model for how to deal with a smallpox outbreak. People might be prepared in every locality, and then be gathered together when necessary. The more public exposure, the more people are needed, for obvious reasons. Availability of protected personnel to me is vastly important, and that would mean field epidemiologists, lab people and care providers, designated people. And I would suggest that older and foreign MD's who were previously vaccinated ought to be given priority. Multi-locality Federal cooperation is really advantageous.

Most important determinant to the eventual number of cases is whether or not somebody gets put in the hospital. And everything should be done to prevent that, and the most important thing is initial recognition. That depends on the state of alertness and familiarity with the possibility of the syndrome. And a dedicated facility need not be large, but better small and agreed-upon than large and contentious. I don't know whether you people have had such discussions in your localities, but we certainly have.

Populations requiring separate vaccination policy. See, I didn't know those three questions, but I anticipated them. Vaccinating those expected to implement control, those known exposed to a case or an exposed person, those not so exposed but at risk of work place exposure, and members of the community at large.

With respect to the first, I think this is very essential that there be designated individuals who are vaccinated in advance, with VIG available and with screening for those at risk for complications. Oops, I think I missed one. That's all right. Yes, that was my point.

This is the people who are actually exposed. Now I was asked to speak about post-exposure vaccination a few minutes ago. There's not much to say about it. I can give you the little bit of data that I have. It isn't very good data. I expect that post-exposure vaccination does make a difference. I don't know exactly, on a day-specific basis, how that difference changes. I would certainly want to be vaccinated myself, and I would want to vaccinate my relatives. I would also think about passive immunization and chemotherapy, of which I know nothing -- the latter, at least. But we would do whatever we could.

We're going to have to expect, if there is an importation, that there are going to be people we do not identify who have already been exposed, so we'd better prepare for it.

These are figures that have already been shown -- no, that's not. That's not true, sorry. The last two columns compare post-exposure to no vaccination. You can talk yourself into there being a difference, if you wish. My guess is there is, but I couldn't convince any biostatistician of it. Similarly, nine out of 19 who got post-exposure vaccination were affected, compared to one out of three. Can't make a big case out of that. And by the same token, 12 out of 16 versus 26 out of 27. If you put all these numbers together, you might or might not get statistical significance. They would be heavily confounded by a variety of circumstances which are not under control, so I wouldn't want to say we have strong evidence that it works, but it should be done anyway.

I have the opinion that doctors and emergency room workers should not be vaccinated a priori, as a category. I think that is true because the likelihood of their being exposed, even under circumstances of importation, is very, very small. And I also think that that will eventually become mass vaccination, whether we want it to be or not. They will be concerned about their families. There will be people making decisions who have not thought through the risk issues.

Policemen and firemen and everybody else who potentially might be exposed under a contingency will demand equal treatment and I don't think it'll work. Unexposed community members have negligible risk. There is a substantial risk from a vaccine, as you'll hear in a moment. It is the single most dangerous live vaccine. We would still need to vaccinate and identify contacts. We would need personnel and resources for surveillance rather than mass vaccination. That protection will not be maintained. It will gradually wane and we'll have to do it again and again.

The informed consent that you would have to prepare to vaccinate somebody in the public, if it's honest, would have to say that the dangers would exceed the benefits. And even if you fudged those words in such a way that you were happy and thought it would be convincing, an awful lot of people who ultimately might be exposed would not be convinced. You'd have to go back again anyway. So I don't think it would work and I don't think it would be beneficial.

If people are worried about endemic smallpox, it disappeared from this country not because of our mass herd immunity. It disappeared because of our economic development. And that's why it disappeared from Europe and many other countries, and it will not be sustained here, even if there were several importations, I'm sure. It's not from universal vaccination.

So if I were the New York health czar, knowing a case would get on the subway, I would rather have the money to prepare field workers than to give mass vaccination. The first unnecessary death from a vaccination complication would result in more, not less, smallpox transmission because people who needed the vaccination under that circumstance would refuse it. The presence of partial herd immunity would not lessen work and might lead to complacency.

So my views on the three questions are obvious. I would choose option one for the first one. I would choose option two for the second one. And I would emphasize the inclusion of local people because CDC cannot respond quickly enough, and there will become -- when the difference between the second or third post-exposure day and the sixth through the seventh post-exposure day might be important. And under option -- number three, surveillance, surveillance, surveillance. It's not ring vaccination, it's surveillance. Vaccination is a subsidiary issue. Thank you very much.

DR. MODLIN: Thank you, Dr. Mack.

**********************************************
Ingri Cassel, President
Vaccination Liberation - Idaho Chapter
P.O. Box 1444
Coeur d'Alene, ID 83816
(208)255-2307/ 765-8421
vaclib@coldreams.com

www.vaclib.org
"Free Your Mind....
From The Vaccine Paradigm"

*************************************************

ONLY 1% of serious drug reactions reported to the FDA

30,000 ADVERSE REACTIONS AND OVER 5000 DEATHS (THAT BEING ONLY WHAT WAS

REPORTED!)

http://www.vaccineawareness.org/information/VAERS_statisticsnov01.htm

*Illinois Vaccination Awareness Coalition"

Vaccine
Intial Vaccine Definition

©2001 Illinois Vaccine Awareness Coalition. All Rights Reserved.

*********************************************************************

I can vouch for this I did CPR on my 3 month old neighbor child who died from the same thing but the medical profession just listed it as SIDS. Carolyn

Please DO NOT take, or let your loved ones take, ANY shots or vaccinations until you KNOW, I SAID KNOW, EXACTLY what you are doing!!!! Below is only one of many unbelievable sad examples!!! I SAID ANY!!!!!

Billy-Joe..Mauldin

Death By Lethal Vaccine Injection
Source: http://mercola.com/2002/aug/7/vaccine_death.htm

By Christine Colebeck

Today is my daughter's sweet 16th birthday but we will not be celebrating. Instead I will light a candle and when I blow it out I will make a wish in my daughter's memory. My wish is for all mother's worldwide, that you will educate yourselves and that you make informed choices so that you may prevent unnecessary tragedy and be spared from my pain.

Laura's Story

After 41 weeks of pregnancy, on July 27th, 1986, a perfect and healthy little baby, Laura Marie, made her entrance into the world. We were welcomed home by family and friends anxiously waiting to meet the new family member. They showered her with so many beautiful, little tiny, pink dresses, we joked that she would never be able to wear them all in one lifetime.

Our lives changed completely and now revolved around stroller walks in the park, visiting friends, changing diapers, night feedings and shopping for more little pink dresses. We were parents now, we had a family and life was absolutely perfect.

I took Laura for several baby check-ups at the pediatrician. She was a kind and gentle older woman. At 3 months old, the pediatrician was very pleased with Laura's development and weight gain and vaccinated her with DPT OPV. I didn't even question her, I knew that all my friend's babies had this same vaccine and "all good mothers" vaccinated their children to protect them. I left the pediatrician's office and walked home.

Laura was very fussy, which was unusual. She was crying loudly all the way home in the stroller. When we got home, I realized she had urinated so heavily she wet everything in the stroller. Then her cry turned into screaming and she developed a fever, her leg was very swollen and red, and felt hot. I called the pediatrician who told me this was "normal" and to give her Tempra. I gave her baby Tempra and I felt better, the pediatrician had assured me this was normal.

Laura continued to scream and I could no longer console her. My every instinct told me this was not normal but I was young with my first child and trusted the doctor. I could not hold Laura in my arms because she screamed louder as any movement of her leg seemed to cause her terrible pain. I put her in the swing and she cried herself to sleep. I was so relieved, the Tempra was working and the doctor must have been right. I began to feel silly for all my worrying. A short time later, Laura woke up screaming and spent the evening screaming and sleeping on and off.

She had no appetite and nothing made her stop crying. Finally it was bedtime and she cried in her crib, until she fell asleep. She had never cried herself to sleep before and I felt very bad for letting her but if I held her, she screamed louder. My husband came home from work and I told him about everything that had happened that day. Laura was sleeping soundly in her crib and we were both relieved that she seemed to be feeling better and decided not to worry... I should have worried.

In the morning I awoke and was startled to realize my husband had slept in for work. I immediately knew something was wrong and the worry from the previous night came rushing back to me. I quickly ran to her crib, with a feeling of dread. She did not look right. I closed my eyes tight and opened them again, and considered the possibility that this was a dream, but when I opened my eyes she looked dead.

I went into shock and after that, much of this day remains a blur. I touched her and she was very warm. I screamed for my husband to call 911.

I watched as he performed CPR, my body was frozen and I couldn't move. He tried to revive our child to no avail. He was shouting for me to open the door for the paramedics, I was temporarily jolted back to reality and I went and opened the door. I could now move but couldn't speak. I just stood there numbly shaking my head, feeling completely helpless as dozens of paramedics, police and firemen rushed past me into our home. I didn't cry, and I wanted to scream at them to leave her alone but I couldn't speak. She was on the floor and they were shocking her tiny body, in the little bedroom with the yellow painted walls and clown wallpaper. I stood there praying in my head that they would just leave her alone, that they would get out of her bedroom and that I would wake up from this horrible dream.

Then I heard someone saying there was a faint pulse and I suddenly felt hopeful. She was rushed from the house in an ambulance. It was then that the homicide detectives led us into another room and the interrogation began.

They decided that my husband and I needed to be questioned in separate rooms. I immediately realized they suspected that we had done this to our child. We all know that perfect children do not suddenly die for no reason. I was silent, I had already decided in my own mind that this was somehow all my fault and although I wasn't quite sure what I had done to kill her, I was convinced that I had somehow caused this to happen. Perhaps, I was being punished by god for a sin or perhaps it happened because I had let her cry herself to sleep that night. The fact remained that my child was dead and "good mothers" do not have dead children.

My husband began to protest loudly about the line of questioning and he demanded we be taken immediately to the hospital, to see our child. The detectives finally took us to the hospital and put us in the "bad news room." The doctor came and insisted we sit down before he spoke to us. He began telling us that they had tried this and that and then finally he said the words that would echo in my ears for a lifetime:

"She is dead."

The pediatrician whom I so respected and adored broke down and cried when I gave her the news on the phone. She went back and forth defending the vaccine that she was told was safe, and blaming it for killing my child and those who told her it was safe.

She then told me that she also had another patient, an infant boy, die after this same vaccination.

Then the detectives took us home for more questions, often repeating the same questions several times until they grew tired of asking them. The questions constantly centered around our involvement, then they searched the house and checked for signs of forced entry. My husband repeatedly told them that he thought the vaccine had killed our child and told them over and over about her unusual behavior since she was vaccinated.

Everyone we knew arrived at our house. I made coffee and tidied the house, like it was any other day and we were having "guests". Shock is a strange and wonderful thing and of course you don't know you are in it.

My parents finally insisted on taking me to their house for a few days, while my husband and his friends had the horrendous task of packing up the nursery because I couldn't stand to look at it any longer. The room I had so lovingly made was now empty and a source of great pain.

Several days later, after the funeral and the tiny white coffin that was so small my husband carried it alone, I finally came out of shock and allowed myself to cry a river. I cried for all the things I would never do with my daughter. All the ballet classes I would never take her to, the wedding I would never attend, the grandchildren I would never know and all the dreams I would never realize with her. I cried for all that was and all that would never be. There was an emptiness inside of me that threatened to swallow me up whole, as I fell into the depths of grief during the darkest days of my life.

The detectives eventually became satisfied that we had not harmed our daughter in any way and the investigation into her death ended. We were then left without answers.

The doctors did not want to talk about her death being related in any way to the vaccine and, one after the other, refused to answer our many questions. I was repeatedly told that vaccines were for "the greater good." I was even told that loss of life through immunization was "expected" in the war against disease but these losses were considered to be at "acceptable" levels. However, this did not feel very acceptable or good to me as a mother with empty arms that ached for my child. The coroner finally told us months later that the cause of death was determined to be "SIDS" (sudden infant death syndrome), meaning "no known cause," and refused to release a copy of the autopsy report to us.

It took almost a year for us to obtain this report and to our great horror, we realized that the autopsy summery was copied directly from the vaccine product monograph under the heading "Contraindications" as follows:

"Sudden infant death syndrome has been reported following administration of vaccines containing Diphtheria, tetanus toxoids, and pertussis vaccine. However, the significance of these reports is not clear. One common factor is the age where primary immunization was done between the age of 2 to 6 months, a period where most sudden infant death syndromes are found to 1occur with a peak incidence being at 2 to 4 months."

There was no toxicology testing performed and the pediatrician never filed an adverse vaccine reaction report with health authorities. I later learned that most vaccine-induced deaths in this country are listed as SIDS and SIDS statistics are NOT included in vaccine adverse reaction data, even if a child dies only a few hours after receiving inoculation. This data is presented to physicians and the public to reassure them that vaccines are safe.

The government's own literature advises that there has been little or no testing in the area of vaccine safety or efficacy. Essentially, our children are the test. According to their literature, immunization is "the most cost effective" way to prevent disease. Nowhere in their literature does it claim to be the safest. We are trading our children's lives to save the government money. We are told that the benefits outweigh the risks but many of the diseases that we vaccinate for are not even life threatening; however, the vaccine itself has the potential to kill.

Vaccines kill at a much higher rate than we are led to believe. We play vaccine roulette with our children's lives and we never know which child will fall victim next.

If the odds are 1 in 500 thousand for death, 1 in 100 thousand for permanent brain injury, 1 in 1700 for seizures and convulsions or one in 100 for adverse reaction, are you willing to take that chance? Are any odds acceptable enough to convince you to gamble with your child's life?

I can assure you that death from vaccination is neither quick nor painless. I helplessly watched my daughter suffer an excruciatingly slow death as she screamed and arched her back in pain, while the vaccine did as it was intended to do and assaulted her immature immune system. The poisons used as preservatives seeped through her tiny body, overwhelming her vital organs one by one until they collapsed. It is an image that will haunt me forever and I hope no other parent ever has to witness it.

A death sentence considered too inhumane for this county's most violent criminals was handed down to my beautiful, innocent, infant daughter, death by lethal injection.

Today, on my daughter's birthday, I will grieve not only for the loss of my own child but for all the innocent children for which the benefits of vaccines do not outweigh the risks and are unnecessarily sentenced to death by lethal injection, under the guise of "the greater good." The true war is not against disease; we have somehow become our own worst enemy by putting our faith in science instead of nature. Today, I call on all mothers across the world to join me in putting an end to this senseless slaughter of our most precious resource, our children.

Response from Dawn Richardson, President, PROVE

Dear PROVE Members

I am forwarding this . as a tribute to baby Laura and all the other children who have been injured or killed by a vaccine so that parents can learn another side to the vaccine story.

When I was almost 8 months pregnant with one of my daughters, I had volunteered to go to the Travis County Morgue with Karin Schumacher who, for years before she went to Law School, ran the NVIC news-list. Karin asked me to help her go through autopsy reports of infants listed as SIDS deaths and look at vaccination information. I will never forget the experience. We sat there in this basement buried in infant autopsy reports as my own baby kicked and turned inside of me.

Here were two of our observations:

One of the things that struck me when reading Christine's story . is that here we are 16 years later and so many doctors are still downplaying and denying the risks of vaccines and healthy babies are still dying after being vaccinated.

One of the most offensive things that Senator Frist has in his vaccine bill which shields the drug companies from all liability when a vaccine injures or kills someone is that he is proposing that the federal government increase the amount of money that a parent receives from the government compensation program when their child is killed by a vaccine. Parents are not willing to be bought off with this blood money. Elected officials like Frist who want to eliminate the financial responsibility of the drug companies all together and throw the bone to parents that the government will pay them more if the government mandated vaccine kills their kid need to be voted out of Congress. If you haven't sent your email notes to your senators to oppose S 2053 yet - PLEASE do! If drug companies have ZERO threat of liability, the one thing we can be certain of is that stories like [Laura's] will become far more common.

The key to change is education. Fortunately, the Internet allows parents to educate parents. Please stop for a quiet moment after reading the note and say a prayer for all the babies whose lives were ended before they even got a chance to really start . and then take the time to forward this on to other parents.

Sincerely, Dawn Richardson
President, PROVE

Senator Frist's Vaccine Bill S 2053

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DR. MERCOLA'S COMMENT: E-mail to a friend

I strongly urge you to forward this particular piece to everyone -- parents, expecting parents, women in their childbearing years, and anyone who may know such individuals - and ask them to forward it on, too. One of the greatest powers of the Internet is that we can spread important information quickly; another is that we are not (yet!) restricted from doing so by government or corporate bodies.

Laura's tragic story is, sadly, anything but new. For years, as you can see via the links below or by searching on Mercola.com, I have warned against vaccines, as have other credentialed physicians. The good they may do is overwhelmed by the harm they inflict, from the trauma of being stuck with endless needles to inflicting the very disease they are supposed to guard against to, as this story shows, death.

There are alternate and vastly safer methods that all begin with a truly healthy diet as outlined in my Eating Plan; of course, drug manufacturers and the government they have purchased don't want you to believe that the foods you consume and the habits you adopt are the primary solution to establishing immunity to diseases and living longer. They want you to believe that their pharmaceuticals, including vaccines, are essential to your existence, and your children's.

Their wealth relies on your dependency, and so they will do everything to crush the notion of "natural" - meaning they don't profit from it, and you take back the control - health. They will spend three billion dollars this year alone in advertisements for their pharmaceuticals, preying on unsuspecting consumers' hopes and fears with these carefully crafted campaigns. Apparently, they will not even stop at killing our children to feed their greed.

Again, I encourage you to check out the links below, and to use the powerful search feature on Mercola.com, using terms such as "vaccine" or "pharmaceutical manufacturer," to find out how the traditional medical establishment is putting your life and the lives of those you love at risk -- and how to take back your health.

Related Articles:

* * *

The cops never question the doctor who has injected the deadly vaccine after a SIDS death yet parents are always questioned and interrogated. In many cases parents are charged for murder or 'shaken baby syndrome' with resulting death. The black robed thugs (judges) hold their victims guilty as charged and throw the innocent parents into jail. The evil governments and pharmaceutical corporation continue in their devious genocide practices. As long as underhanded and deceptive scum like Richard Warman play a role, even a minor one, in government that long we will not see honesty and integrity in government. --

**COPYRIGHT NOTICE** In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for nonprofit research and educational purposes only. [Ref. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml]

****************************************************************Subject:

*****************************************************************

So what can you do to protect your children? E-Mail

HEW@neo.rr.com and request
"Bio-War & Non-Vaccine Protection "

-30-

HEW Menu